The guru parampara of the Gaudiya Math established the
link with the Brahma-Madhva Sampradaya. Thus, along
with the other three sampradayas (Sri Sampradaya, Rudra
Sampradaya and Kumara Sampradaya) the Brahma Sampradaya
teaches the Vedic culture to the world. There are also
a few points of these four sampradayas that were incorporated
by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu into the Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya
Sampradaya.
In the narration of Sri Navadvip-Dham-Mahatmya Srila
Bhaktivinode Thakur relates the time when Sri Nityananda
Prabhu took Srila Jiva Gosvami on a tour. Herein it
is mentioned how Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepted
two principles from each of the four sampradayas and
incorporated these into His own sampradaya. It is also
mentioned that the four principal acharyas of these
four lineages later took birth as Lord Chaitanya's
devotees during His manifest lila:
Ramanuja of the Sri-Sampradaya preached the philosophy
of dasya-rasa and visishta-advaita. He was reborn
as the gaura-bhakta named Ananta who lived near Vallabhacharya's
house. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepted the following
two principles from the Laksmi-Sampradaya.
1.The concept of unalloyed devotion free from karma
and jñana -ananya-bhakti.
2.Service to the devotees - bhakta-jana-seva.
Madhva of the Brahma-Sampradaya preached the dvaita philosophy. The following points were accepted from this sampradaya:
1.The complete defeat of the Mayavadi philosophy - Keval-advaita-nirasana.
2.The worship of the deity of Krishna and understanding
it to be eternal - krsna-murti-sevana.
Vishnusvami of the Rudra-Sampradaya preached suddha-advaita philosophy. He was reborn as the Gaura-bhakta named Vallabha Bhatta who perfected his own sampradaya by Gauranga's mercy. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu accepted the following from this sampradaya:
1.The sentiment of total dependence on Krishna - tadiya-sarvasva-bhava
2.The path of spontaneous devotional service - raga-marga.
Nimbarka of the Kumara-Sampradaya preached dvaita-advaita philosophy. He was reborn as the Gaura-bhakta named Keshava Kashmiri . Again, two points were accepted:
1.The need of taking exclusive shelter of Radhika -
ekanta-radhikasraya.
2.The exalted mood of the gopis' love for Sri Krishna
- gopi-bhava.
The concentrated theistic outlook of worshipping the
Lord above all gives Vaisnavas a common cause and foundation.
Their primary focus is avisesa-vada, the monotheistic
explanation of the Vedanta. The worship of the deity
of the Supreme Lord, and the respect held for the great
acharyas in all sampradayas are also characteristic
traits of the Vaisnava traditions.
In his book Prema Pradipa, Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur
points out the following:
1.The Supreme Lord is one without a second. He possesses
all transcendental potencies and controls all laws.
2.The Supreme Lord has an exquisitely beautiful, all-auspicious
spiritual form. That form is transcendental to all
laws of the material world. In Him all contradictions
are wonderfully reconciled. Though He has a form,
He is all pervading. Though He is beautiful, mundane
sense cannot perceive Him. Though situated in one
place, He is simultaneously fully present everywhere.
3.Both the animate and inanimate are born from His energies.
He is the creator, maintainer, and destroyer of time,
place, and law.
4.The living entity's constitution is spiritual, but
by the Lord's desire he is conditioned by material
nature and thus enjoys or suffers under those laws.
By the process of devotional service, however, he
is freed from material bondage.
5.The path of jñana and karma are full of hardship.
When jñana and karma serve the purpose of bhakti,
there is no fault. But, unlike karma and jñana,
bhakti is fully independent.
6.The living entity's duty is to associate with sadhus
and discuss devotional service.
The Gaudiya Math tradition teaches us that the divine
couple in Vrindavan is the original form of Godhead,
and Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is Krishna Himself combined
with his dearmost Srimati Radharani. Sri Chaitanya
Mahaprabhu came to give this truth. He is the yuga
avatar who distributes the congregational chanting
of the Holy Names all over the world. His appearance
made Sri Navadvip identical with Vrindavan. Thus, Sri
Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is also called the bhakta avatar
and sometimes the hidden avatar, since he generally
concealed his divine nature and preached Krishna bhakti,
absorbed in the mood of separation.
Not all Vaisnava sampradayas embrace this ontology,
but concentrate more on the worship of Sri Laksmi Narayan,
Sri Sita Rama, Sri Nataji, Sri Balaji, and Sri Venkateshvara.
Nevertheless, they still all worship the Supreme Personality
of Godhead. In addition, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu has
already become more and more accepted as the yuga avatar.
In Vrindavan, as well as in South India, the drama
of Sri Chaitanya's Lila has been included into the
drama presentations, and the whole world has learned
about the glory of the sanatana-dharma through His
influence.
Some Thoughts On Other Religions
The Gaudiya Math also recognizes the fact that the Supreme
Lord has manifested messages to humanity in other religions
as well. Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur, for example, gave
great respect to the teachings of Jesus calling him
the savior of Jerusalem, and also wrote comments on
the first Commandment. Many other famous Vaisnava acharyas
preached about Jesus with the same spirit. The president
of the Visva Vaisnava Raj Sab Srila B. P. Puri Maharaj,
said: The contribution of Jesus to the world of theism
cannot be ignored." Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu
is also known to have spoken with Muslims on many occasions.
He even referred to the Koran and accepted Allah as
another name for Vishnu.
While the Gaudiya Math accepts the validity of all pure
theism, it has proved necessary to clarify areas where
followers have deviated from the original teachings.
As an example of this, in his multiple encounters
with Christian leaders, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami
Maharaj stressed that Thou shalt not kill" includes
animals as well. In fact, Father Canciani of Rome
published a book called Jesus was a Vegetarian. In
his research, he discovered that the first Christians
had been persecuted by Roman authorities and cattle
farmers because they were preaching and spreading vegetarianism.
It must also be noted that in the Gospel of the Twelve,
one of the older Christian scriptures, Jesus is found
teaching vegetarianism, reincarnation, and the law
of karma almost with the same vocabulary as the faithful
Vaisnava. Considering that the Essenes (Jesus' own
community) were known to be strict vegetarians, it
can be concluded that the modern Christian meat eaters
have deviated from their real teachings.
Such things have happened in Kali Yuga in all religions.
We have to find the essence. In this way it will become
very obvious that all true theistic religions teach
the same moral standards that guide humanity towards
loving devotional service. Those who wish to gain
access to the deepest and finest of all of God's messages
to this world will study the deeper ontology of every
religion. Such studies, handled by true devotees, will
never become the cause for violent disputes (such as
the disputes often created by political manipulators
for selfish purposes).
The Gaudiya Math has converted members from all religions
and schools of thought to Vaisnavism. Still, the positive
spirit of cooperation with other religions for the
moral upliftment of humanity is fully accepted by Gaudiya
Vaisnavas. At the same time, the Gaudiya Math will
also spare no effort to make everyone happy in this
world by respectfully sharing with them the gifts of
Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu.
Caste and Cultures / Superiority & Inferiority Complexes
The scriptures fully support the conversion of all peoples
to Vaisnavism, and thus the right and duty for all
to practice the highest services of the Vaisnava faith.
Yet, somehow or another, very deeply rooted in the
conditioned soul, there is prejudice against others
whose origin lay in a different culture, caste, or
race. Whatever influences of the past have impregnated
this psychology of imperfection, it stands out as a
shameful reality.
This difficulty exists even among the Vaisnavas in India.
There, for example, neophyte Vaisnavas of Bengali origin
do not get along with those of Hindi speaking origin.
Similarly, when Westerners suddenly showed up to preach
Vaisnavism in the dress of sannyasis and spiritual
masters, it was not easy for some neophyte Vaisnavas
of India to accommodate them. European and, especially,
American superiority complexes with respect to poorer
countries and different races also gave quite a bad
taste to the behavior of the young Western Vaisnavas.
However, the Vaisnava communities have succeeded in
combining the greatest variety of people living and
working together towards a common goal.
Srila Rupa Goswami has personally condemned looking
upon a Vaisnava in accordance with their birth. Therefore,
we should be very careful in this regard. The Gaudiya
Math family now branches out all over the world and
many tests will have to be passed to prove that we
really see beyond the bodies and behave as real brothers
and sisters.
It is not only fear of the unknown which stands in our
way, but also straight out selfishness that opposes
our true vision. Sometimes we feel antipathy against
one devotee or devotee group, and the next moment we
feel sympathy towards another. Both of these feelings
are rooted in the same error. We should look at all
Vaisnavas as our worshipable prabhus. Any type of inclination
which is rooted in some kind of prejudice is against
the highest principle.
We may sometimes feel that it is necessary to preach
to some social class apart from the general public
due to their inaccessibility of a common platform.
This may be done, but it is dangerous; and until the
recruits from that different social order come down
from their prejudiced platform and honor all Vaisnavas
equally, it will be difficult to successfully convert
them to being true Vaisnavas.
As an example of this, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu refused
to go and see the devotee king Prataparudra Maharaj
since a renunciate should not associate with people
in worldly positions. On the other hand, He offered
the highest regard to a Muslim-born devotee, Srila
Haridas Thakur.
Any type of superiority complex harbored within a neophyte
Vaisnava should be clearly understood to be an enemy
of real Vaisnava sentiment. On the other hand, any
feeling towards personal inferiority is traditionally
accepted as a good excuse to secure one's position
as the lowest of all servants. Srila Sanatana Goswami
and Srila Haridas Thakur's behavior in Jagannath Puri
give ample evidence of this fact. Therefore, it is
quite appropriate for Western Vaisnavas to feel very
low due to their low birth, but it is an offense on
the other side for a brahmin born Vaisnava to consider
himself superior.
Broadminded concepts fit perfectly into the real Vaisnava
world view and preaching activities. Narrow-minded
persons, trying to cling to birth privileges are simply
outdated and would do better researching the glorious
generosity of the Vedic sages. By the grace of Sri
Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, the real World Vaisnava Family
will rise to embrace the world with Unity in Diversity
reaching all cultures and peoples.
We have already witnessed Germans, Jews and Arabs dancing
together in Sri Vrindavan Dham, music celebrities leading
millions to listen to the Mahamantra, surrealistic
Vaisnava drama troops preaching against the effects
of the age of Kali, and Krishna temples in skyscrapers
and previous Christian churches. There is nothing
which Krishna cannot do.
Is the Gaudiya Math Sectarian?
All forms of God are eternal and they have a transcendental
position. Krishna and Vishnu, for example, have separate
pastimes but they both belong to the same divine truth.
We are not to make a case of contention when discussing
different lilas of the Lord, but simply appreciate
the many ways in which the Lord manifests and the variety
of relationships He develops with His many devotees.
The truth of the conditioned souls approaching spiritual
understanding by the intervention of divine grace creates
the vast diversity that we encounter. If we cannot
appreciate that, we may as well doubt our own convictions
and how they came about.
Sincere searchers of the truth have received help from
within and without throughout the ages. At the same
time, there have always been corrupting tendencies
of the conditioned soul within all spiritual currents.
Still, as Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Maharaj often
said: Love for God is the highest goal of life. It
does not matter how a person got this love of God.
If he has it, he is a perfect person." With
respect to other Vaisnava sampradayas, this same principle
applies. As our prominent acharya Srila Bhaktivinode
Thakur has taught: Vaisnavas are happy about any manifestation
of true theism in this world.
Gaudiya Vaisnavas will take any valid thought regardless
of where it comes from. For example, Hegel's statement:
Die to live," was often used by Srila B. R. Sridhar
Maharaj in describing the surrender of the soul to
Krishna. Vaisnavas are also willing to expose their
teachings to constructive critique in a very non-dogmatic
way.
Naturally, the Gaudiya Math teaches many religious principles
and rejects those who intend to harm other living entities.
As such, in the world of irreligion and corruption,
Gaudiya Math teachers stand out as revolutionaries
spreading a world consciousness of proper behavior
and spiritual fulfillment; they are not yogis who promote
personal salvation and indifference to the suffering
world.
The Gaudiya Math wants to contribute that which has
been received from our disciplic succession to all
thinkers of the world from all schools of thought and
to serve humanity at large. It wants to distribute
the happy nectar given to the world by God Himself.
In the form of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, He introduced
the congregational chanting of the Holy Name. The divine
principles of Sri Krishna's lila of love can cure humanity
from the addiction to mundane lust, and there is no
room for sectarianism in this effort.
Vaisnavism - Real and Apparent
The material nature and the agents of illusion (Maya)
often come to disturb the Vaisnava faith. Due to this,
difficulties arise between those who follow the highest
Vaisnava ideals and those who simply claim to do so.
The cheating mentality called vipralipsa manifests
everywhere in this material world. Vaisnava movements
are not immune to this. Therefore, it is the duty of
the acharyas to always maintain the purity in their
realm of influence. They must denounce any misuse
which may disturb Vaisnava missionary activities, and
cause wrong impressions in the public opinion of Vaisnavas.
Vaisnavism - real and apparent - is a topic which
has to be discussed among Vaisnavas regularly to protect
ourselves from our own immaturity, flickering minds,
and mountains of false ego.
Every sincere soul, practicing the precepts of the Vaisnava
ideals, can become a pure soul. If the history of
the Caste Goswamis, Smarta Brahmanas, Prakrita Sahajiyas,
and Institutionalists have created a disturbing influence
in this world, it only confirms the famous sloka:
Devotional service which is not executed in accordance with the verdict of the revealed scriptures is simply an unnecessary disturbance to human society". (Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu 1.2.101). We have to do everything we can to reach the highest purity in our spiritual life and our spiritual missions. Those who follow the sanatan dharma are always dedicated to fighting off tyranny, both in the physical world and in the realm of thought. If any person manifests symptoms of a true Vaisnava and promotes the pure values of Vaisnavism, then everyone's heart will become happy.
Renunciates in our sampradaya previously dressed in
the way of babajis. The six Goswamis of Vrindavan wore
such dress. At the same time, they preached vigorously
by writing many books, holding regular classes, inspiring
the construction of great temples, and establishing
the worship of the deities with great love. They established
holy places and sent their followers to distribute
the literature in all directions. During Srila Prabhupad
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati's time, babajis such as Srila
Jagannath das Babaji Maharaj and Srila Gaur Kishor
das Babaji Maharaj carried on the tradition. Even
today we see many babajis in the Holy Dham who preach
the Gaudiya Math tradition, serving both the Dham and
the devotees who visit there.
However, due to the influence of the age of Kali and
the many unfortunate activities of some who dressed
as babajis, that dress was not respected among the
common people at the time Gaudiya Math began. Many
of these so called babajis were living of donations
by the pious and ignorant public without any real contribution
to the mission of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Due to
their questionable behavior many fell under suspicion
of public opinion. Among the babaji groups who were
not favorable to the Gaudiya Math were the followers
of a Babaji who became well known for chanting their
"own" mantra everywhere. These babajis were
not accepted by the true Radha Kunda babajis.
Considering Sri Radha Kunda the holiest of all places,
the Gaudiya Math took Sri Radha Kunda's glory all over
the world. Yet even some of the residents of Radha
Kunda's shores, did not appreciate what the Gaudiya
Math had done. Srila Prabhupad Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati
Thakur clearly denounced these materialistic tendencies
among the residents of the Dham. At the same time,
he gave a clear understanding of who a real babaji
is; i.e. who does and does not deserve the respect
given to a true renunciate. There is, therefore, really
no opportunity for conflict. The Gaudiya Math accepts
real babajis and Dham gurus, but stays away from those
who lack substance.
Relations with Caste Goswamis and Smarta Brahmanas
A person can only be accepted as a genuine Vaisnava
if he accepts the basic precepts of the sampradayas
and can explain his course of action according to the
shastras. Caste Goswamis such as the descendants of
the Nityananda Vamsa, Advaita Vamsa, and Smarta Brahmanas
want to limit mercy to the rights and duties acquired
through one's birth. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, along
with Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur and the acharyas following
in his line have actively refuted this stand and defeated
the idea in many debates.
The high priest of the demons, often mentioned in the
Puranas, is called Sukracharya. The literal translation
is Seminal-Acharya,' or someone who declares the birth
connection the only way to transmit powerful positions
to future generations. This proposal has always been
refuted by the Vaisnava sampradaya. There are so many
stories that speak of this. One outstanding story is
that of Valmiki, formerly a murderer, was transformed
by the initiation he received from Srila Narada Muni
and converted into the great author of the Ramayana,
the holy scripture.
In our modern world it is already common for people
born in non-Vedic families and previously addicted
to sinful activities to start Vaisnava missions and
initiate others (including brahmin born Hindus) into
the real brahmin Vaisnava tradition. This is a revolution
in itself that has helped to create a great renovation
and invigoration of spirit among Hindu born people
both in India and abroad.
Vaisnavas and Impersonalists have a rift which goes
back to the puranic times and to the great Vedic acharyas.
The Gaudiya Math continues to take the appropriate
strong stand against all who claim themselves to be
God or otherwise, that God has no personality. This
is not the forum to enter deeply into the ontological
discussion of this rift. Still, it must be mentioned
here that the material world is full of theories and
speculations leaning on the advaita, or monistic, impersonal
world view, which has created havoc in the minds of
the conditioned souls.
Even though many of the impersonalists share a good
amount of the Vedic Vaisnava siddhanta, it still holds
true that their apathy towards serving a personal God
in eternity is making their company a danger for the
tender faith of love. Therefore, the Gaudiya Math has
taken up the strong banner of pure monotheism in order
to save the world from voidness and impersonalism.
Our acharyas are also well known for their strong teachings
that have converted Mayavadis to the Vaisnava faith.
Followers of the Vedanta schools who exclude the transcendental
lila of the Lord from their conception of Nityananda
are not considered favorable to devotional feelings
of the Vaisnava sanga. As such, they are to be avoided
and cannot be considered theists in the true sense
of the word. Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur even wrote that
one should not associate with those who hesitate to
criticize the impersonal interpretation of the Vedanta.
Since the impersonal interpretation of the word theism
already contradicts the dictionary understanding, one
can easily understand how such an interpretation becomes
the source of many arguments. Theo is God and God
is the Supreme Person: the one without an equal - with
no one superior to Him. If the Supreme had no personality,
in some way He would already be less than all the thinking,
feeling and willing persons of His creation. This idea
is unacceptable to a Vaisnava, thus he cannot accept
either the Buddhist's nor the other Impersonalist's
interpretations of the final truth.
The last snare of illusion, even when accompanied by
austere and pious behavior, is this impersonalist assumption.
Without real humility, the Mayavadi concludes: There
is no higher being or authority above me. I can save
myself. My individuality was a good for nothing' affair."
Vaisnavas feel deep compassion for souls with such
frustrated conceptions, but they also understand that
the world of love is hiding from people with such an
attitude. Therefore, Vaisnavas try to spread the Holy
Name of the Lord to purify the whole world from such
attitudes.
Those who claim to practice Vaisnavism but have introduced
unauthorized changes of conduct or conceptions into
their practices and philosophy are called imitationists
(imitators) or prakrita sahajiyas. They have deviated
from the sampradaya. In India, there are many well
know groups of such imitators and their misconstrued
teachings, such as the Auls, Bauls, Gauranga Nagari,
and Sakhi Bheki and many more, old and new. In addition,
some neophytes claim to already be on the platform
of Krishna Consciousness while they are really not
so. To be able to identify the imitators, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakur Prabhupad compiled a book called Prakrita
Rasa Sata Dusani. At the same time, he re-established
the full glory of the Brahma Madhva Gaudiya Sampradaya
through his Gaudiya Math.
Imitation is generally found when the lazy mentality
of the conditioned soul wants to get a cheaper, easier
version of spiritual life. The misuse of the Vaisnava
philosophy to get money, women, or fame will also drag
someone away from the real process. The ongoing search
for purity, or permanently watching and always remaining
under the guidance of truly advanced Vaisnavas, is
the only protection from falling into the influences
from the external world, and the imitator tendencies
within the mind.
Temples in the Kingdom of Maya
Human beings are subject to a world of misunderstandings.
These misunderstandings also manifests between Vaisnavas.
Once, when asked why there is so much Maya to be found
even in a Temple of Krishna, a sadhu replied: We should
not be surprised when we find Maya in the temples,
we should be surprised that there are temples in the
kingdom of Maya."
The more branches a tree has, the more opulent he looks,
and the more blessings he will give. Therefore, Krishna's
unity is full of diversity. But, Maya wants to divide
and not let the victims get any chance to reunite with
other Vaisnavas. For that reason, Maya invents a great
amount of psychological tricks. Here are just a few
of those mental excuses which keep us away from the
much needed sadhu sanga.
1. My guru is really the only one who can give the highest
nectar. Therefore, I will not associate with anyone
who has not realized this fact.
2. I am so fallen that I will not go to contaminate other
devotees.
3. If I associate with other Vaisnavas and their missions,
my disciples will notice that I am not the only real
devotee after all, and they may stop loving me.
4. Maybe my disciples will be more attracted to another
devotee - senior to me - and will want to leave my
company.
5. Other Vaisnavas may have different standards than
we have in our temples and the absolute understanding
of my disciples may be disturbed.
6. I do not like to listen for hours when other Vaisnavas
lecture.
My spiritual master once wrote me in a letter, You Westerners
are always in a fighting spirit, and even if you do
not want to fight, someone will induce you to fight
anyway." Let us consider the fact that in almost
all communities soon or later some fight or misunderstanding
erupts. What can be done? Somehow, the locally involved
devotees have to solve this problem; which they usually
do quite quickly. Sometimes, however, disputes over
the jurisdiction of preaching paraphernalia such as
temples, vehicles etc., may endure longer due to an
unclear instruction from the departed spiritual master.
Yet, as we have often witnessed, even disputes such
as those mentioned above do not stop our preaching
spirit. Nor do individual misunderstandings or even
fights between individuals and missions usually affect
the overall relationship others maintain with the disputing
parties. They are usually considered secondary. Since
smaller and larger disputes may appear at any time,
we should carefully observe how the advanced devotees
deal with such situations. In this way, we will learn
to continue preaching without being too affected when
Kali yuga manifests in some way.
Vaisnava institutions are also not meant to make us
lazy, complacent, envious, indifferent or non-intellectual.
They are not created to let others think for us. Thus,
leaders should do well to train their disciples in
such a way that their sraddha, as well as the association
with other Vaisnavas of the same sampradaya can survive
in their absence. Otherwise, a cult will be created,
not a branch of the Vaisnava Sampradaya - as Srila
Jiva Goswami conceived of it.
By Krishna's arrangement all little difficulties can
be harmonized. We need only to be attached to real
sadhus and preach. Thus, more facility than we can
handle will appear by Krishna's grace; as He can give
His devotees anything at anytime. This is one of the
important lessons to be learned from the Gaudiya Math
history. Those who, in the past, had become enveloped
by territorial disputes were rather inattentive to
the preaching and may even have lost some of Krishna's
assets due to their negligence.
On the other hand, those who continued with the real
spirit of the Gaudiya Math preaching work and renounced
the easy facilities (by starting again in the same
humble way their guru had started his mission) received
support and new enthusiasm from all sides and expanded
the real service world beyond the limits of expectation.
There are many examples of this still taking place.
As we have come to witness, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta
Swami Maharaj, Srila B. R. Sridhar Dev Maharaj and
Srila B. P. Puri Maharaj (to mention just a few very
important personalities in the recent history of the
Gaudiya Math) all acted in the same way. They kept
friendly ties with their close Vaisnava friends and
godbrothers even if they had disputed with others.
They kept aloof to those discrepancies for the sake
of serving their gurus. They even forgave those who
had offended them in the past for the sake of serving
Vaisnava harmony. They worked with their godbrothers
in a surrendered mood and tried to unite the Vaisnavas
for the sake of their guru's plans.
They started Vaisnava missions themselves to help spread
the real teachings of their Gurudev to others who prayed
to them for help. Even though they were sometimes outspoken
on a particular situation or disturbance, they did
not exclude any actively preaching godbrother or their
disciples from the Gaudiya Math family and their personal
blessings. In addition, they excused themselves for
having offended others and declared that nobody could
offend them because they were too fallen anyway. If
this is not enough evidence to prove my point, I am
sure we can go to other acharya examples of the past
or present to find that same holy principle alive.
Kali Yuga is an ocean of faults. Victims of Kali engage
in quarrel and hypocrisy. If we want to progress in
spiritual life we must not dwell on the faults of others.
Too much of this activity will simply bring those
faults to manifest within ourselves. If someone is
causing a disturbance for others, he will have to be
dealt with by higher authorities. Whatever our opinion
may be, we shall try to be very generous with others,
strict with ourselves, and do everything possible to
happily accommodate everyone in the Krishna Conscious
family tree. Those who do not have such a wish, but
rather create antagonism among Vaisnavas, can be understood
to be in great need of help.
Party Spirit is the Greatest Enemy of Truth
Any type of preaching that excludes other Vaisnava branches
from receiving the kind grace of Krishna and our parampara
is not very generous, to say the least; what to speak
of those who teach that their mission is the only one
that carries on the true secret of the sampradaya.
This party spirit mentality may impress the new followers
of their mission, but it also goes against the spirit
of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Nityananda Prabhu, Abhirama
and other non-discriminating distributors of mercy.
Party Spirit can manifest subtly or grossly in a preaching
mission especially with overzealous followers. Every
conditioned soul loves to hear that he joined the most
unique mission so that he can think that he is special.
Impartially viewed from a distance, such concepts are
nothing but extended forms of egotism, and the followers
of such concepts are, at best, neophyte Vaisnavas.
Those who engage in party spirit preach the trust worthiness
of a single person or mission. Some preach that their
connection provides a higher seed of bhakti which is
not equaled by others. While they may not disqualify
other acharyas, they often treat their contemporaries
with contempt, especially if they have taken up the
service of acharya. In extreme cases, followers try
to transfer the exclusive credibility of acharya to
one spiritual master at the cost of all the other active
acharyas.
One of the serious problems with party spirit is that
it creates a disturbance in society (Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu
1.2.101). Some party spirit preachers create doubts
in new and old devotees about other spiritual masters.
These doubts circulate and damage the faith of disciples
of other spiritual masters. Party spirit preachers
will warn others with questions such as: Does your
guru give siddha pranali?" Or, What is the adhikara
of this or that guru? Does he know his own spiritual
form in Goloka?"
Those who preach with a party spirit do not like to
associate with other Vaisnavas who are not under their
control. They are often hypocritical, and are not afraid
to commit Vaisnava aparadha or sastra ninda. Party
spirit, in general exploits the highest philosophy
of bhakti by utilizing it as a recruiting technique.
This disturbing mentality is typical for kanistha adhikaris.
The members of missions with exclusive attitudes and
concocted philosophies tend to be hostile towards other
Vaisnavas and are easily offensive. They try to find
faults with other Vaishnavas and thus try to draw support
for their distorted conclusions. If their followers
realize the truth of the situation, they naturally
loose faith in such leaders. Such people without the
connection with the VVRS-WVA are unfortunated, because
they have not learned to associate with other Vaishnavas.
It is the duty of an acharya to protect his disciples
in the beginning stages of their faith from outside
influences that may disturb their tender creeper of
devotion. With the emerging world Vaisnava community
we should try to harmonize with a common universal
interest of saving souls in this world under the banner
of Lord Chaitanya's Sankirtan Movement rather than
clash with different centers of local interest. Love,
trust and respect to all sincere Vaisnavas is a fundamental
principle of sadhu sanga in the active and living tree
of the parampara of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu.
Branches of the Chaitanya Tree
The congregational chanting of the Holy Name inaugurated
by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is the recommended process
of spiritual relief which calls upon humanity to change
its material course of action and degradation. Thus,
the only reason to establish a Vaisnava mission is
to help relieve humanity's suffering and, in this way,
please the Supreme Lord. Those souls who aspire for
the association of other devoted souls, being attracted
by the call of the Vaisnavas, need relief centers where
the ideals of the Vaisnava faith are being taught and
practiced. These places cannot be contaminated by the
selfish, ulterior motives or sense of private proprietorship.
Therefore, it is necessary for the acharya to establish
some kind of religious trust which will assure the
transcendental nature of the activities which develop
in and around the temple or ashram community. Such
places are the best oasis, within this dark world,
where people can participate in the loving devotional
service of the Supreme Lord.
A new branch of the Chaitanya tree manifests as a natural
process springing from the inspiration of an acharya
who wishes to continue the mission of his guru. Sometimes
this creation of a new branch is accompanied by birth
pains due to the lack of acceptance and support from
other Vaisnavas. To establish the dignity and credibility
of such a mission it is necessary to pronounce its
beliefs and procedures of service as part of the preaching
activities.
The nature of a transcendental community may vary according
to the acharya and the sevaites (or board of directors
who protect the spiritual nature of a temple). For
the maintenance of the community, the acharya will
establish the rules and regulations. One thing, however,
is beyond questioning; the purpose and the assets of
the community shall not favor any individual's material
interests, otherwise the purpose of the spiritual oasis
will be spoiled.
Personality cults pervade the earth. Followers of so
called incarnations of God, music celebrities, movie
stars, and politicians, are misguided and loose their
valuable human opportunity for self-realization. Is
the Vaisnava guru another person to guide his followers
according to his own whims? In the jungle of this
material world, where everything, including religious
vocabulary, is used for selfish ends, it is rather
difficult to get a clear picture. Superficial observers
are immediately at a loss; but those who are sincere,
even if they have no connection or clue as to God's
nature can rely on their inner guide to direct them
towards the truth.
Since every genuine guru will always give all the credit
to his guru, considering himself nothing but an instrument
to implement his guru's wishes, it is clear that only
via the criteria of guru, sastra, and sadhu shall
someone be accepted as a bona fide acharya or guru
among the Vaisnavas. This means that his teachings
are subject to the check and balance approval system
within the Vaisnava family.
In some cases, where persons have wrongly taken guru
positions, there have been deviations from the true
Vaisnava path and these personalities have temporarily
mislead their followers. Purity in purpose, therefore,
is recognized only when someone sticks to the goal
of his guru and thus the whole sampradaya. In this
way, there is no difficulty when different branches
of the sampradaya overlap geographically or in a certain
function, since it is assumed that they all follow
the common cause and respect the principle of Unity
in Diversity.
Krishna loves the nirupadhi Vaisnava who executes His
service without being noticed by anyone. But, if he
is neglected by other Vaisnavas, Krishna does not accept
the service of such devotees. The following narration
reminds us of this fact:
When a Raja Suya sacrifice conducted by Yudishthira
Maharaj ended successfully, the bell which hung in
the center of the arena was known to ring on its own
accord. Once, however, after the Brahmanas finished
all their offerings to the Supreme, the rishis, and
the demigods, everyone looked towards the bell but
nothing happened. Desperate Yudishthira asked Krishna
for help. He told them that they had worshipped all
the great personalities but had neglected the simple
humble Vaisnava. Arjuna knew one such devotee who lived
in a straw hut outside Hastinapur. He went to bring
him to the arena. The Vaisnava was reluctant and only
upon hearing that he would meet Krishna did he agree
to go with Arjuna on his chariot. There he was worshipped
by all and Draupadi cooked a feast for him. He mixed
all the different preparation together and ate with
delight. Then he was taken back to his home and everybody
looked towards the bell. Nothing happened. Yudishthira
Maharaj was worried. There seemed to be no solution.
Again the last resort was Krishna. What mistake did
we commit now?" Krishna told them, Somebody must
have offended that Vaisnava." They asked all,
but everyone denied it. Finally, when they asked Draupadi
she lowered her head and said, Yes , I offended him.
I cooked a nice feast for him, but when he mixed all
the preparations together I thought this devotee has
no culture." Krishna confirmed that this was
the offense. The next day Arjuna went to the same
devotee. Again, it was difficult to convince him to
return but finally he could not reject Arjuna's pleading.
He was worshipped and Draupadi cooked another, even
bigger feast for him. He mixed all the preparations
together and as he ate the last morsel of food, the
bell started to ring with great force and all the assembly
rejoiced.